نوع مقاله : علمی-پژوهشی
نویسندگان
1 زبانشناسی رایانشی، دانشکده علوم و فنون نوین، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران
2 دانشیار، گروه ادبیات، دانشگاه پیامنور، تهران، ایران
چکیده
کلیدواژهها
عنوان مقاله [English]
نویسندگان [English]
In contrast to Lacan, who merely used language in subjectivity through "Father's Name", Kristeva introduced language, from the "Semiotic chora" motherhood dimension. Kristeva knows that power and language are intertwined, she sees language as a repressive factor. Thus, by emphasizing the semiotic side, she knows the path to suppression, to pay attention to the "poets' discourse of language". While the goal of post-structuralism is to alter the text, it is the goal of the research ahead, the alteration of the signs of subjectivity, based on Kristeva's views. In this regard, the present study using a descriptive-analytic method, seeks to answer two questions: In the text, what are the symptoms corresponding to the paradigms of poetic language revolution? According to what signs, the way of oppression, is the interaction of the semiotic of the feminine, and the symbolic of the masculine? The result of the research is a rejection of the separatist theory of radical feminism, and a confirmation of Kristeva's belief that women, as the most semiotic carriers, can be represented in a symbolic masculine way by the poetic language revolution. The present study addresses for the first time, Iranian children's literature on Kristeva thought, as well as feminist reading.
کلیدواژهها [English]
|
New York: Continuum.
|
Najafi, Z. (2017). "Analysis of the Semiotic and the Symbolic in Ghesseye Shahre Sangestan Based on Kristeva's Theory". Research in Contemporary World Literature, 22 (2), 615- 639. [in Persian].Oliver, K. (1993). Reading Kristeva: Unraveling the Double-blind. Blooington: Indiana University Press.
Payandeh, H. (2018). Literary Theory and Criticism. Vol (2). Tehran: SAMT. [in Persian].
Payne, M. (1993). Reading Theory: An Introduction to Lacan, Derrida, and Kristeva. Massachusetts: Black Well.
Pourali, H., Farhmand, R., & Bagheri, N. (2014). "A Critical Reading of "Ghaedeye Bazi", a Novel by Firouz Zenouzi Jalali, Based on Julia Christeva's Theory of Abjection".Myth and Story, 2 (2), 26-39. [in Persian].Salami Koochi, E. & Sokoot Jahromi, F. (2014). "The Characters of Nārbānu and Her Sons from the Perspective of Kristeva’s Abject Body". Adab Pazhuhi, 9 (31), 117- 135. [in Persian].Selden, R. & Widdowson. P. (2008). A Reader's Guide to Contemporary Literary Theory. Mokhber. A.(Trs.). Tehran:Tarh-e now.Showalter, E. (1978). A Literature of Their Own: British Women Novelists from Bronte to Lessing. London: Virago.
Tavana, M. & Azarkamand, F. (2015)." Subjectivity of Women and Release in Kristeva’s Thought: The Idea for Participation of Matter Semiotic of Genius in Public Sphere of Symbolic". Women in Development and Polietics, 12 (2), 187- 206. [in Persian].Zanjanbar, A., Bostani, F., &Karimi Dostan, Gh.(2020).The Psychoanalytic Analysis of Metaphor of "Thing from Nothing" Childish Story, Based on Unconscious Language Theory.Journal of Literary Criticism and Rhetoric, 9 (1).[in Persian].
Feminist semanalysis of Children's Story of the 'Alone Black Line' From the perspective of the discourse of poetic language revolution
Amir Hossein Zanjanbar[1]
Ayoob Moradi[2]
abstract
The post-structuralist approach of semanalysis is a combination of semiotics and psychoanalysis and is based on the spaking subject, on two-dimensional heterogeneity of language 'sign' and 'symbolic'. In contrast to Lacan, who merely used language in subjectivity through "Father's Name", Kristeva also introduced language, from the "Signal blindness " motherhood dimension. Kristeva knows that power and language are intertwined, and she sees language as a repressive factor. Thus, by emphasizing the sign side, she knows the path to suppression, to pay attention to the "poets' discourse of language". While the goal of post-structuralism is to alter the text, it is the goal of the research ahead, the alteration of the signs of subjectivity, based on Kristeva 's views. In this regard, the present study using a descriptive-analytic method, seeks to answer two questions: In the text, what are the symptoms corresponding to the paradigms of poetic language revolution? According to what signs, the way of oppression in modern society, is the interaction of the feminine sign, and the symbolic of the masculine? The result of the research is a rejection of the separatist theory of radical feminism, and a confirmation of Kristeva 's belief that women, as the most symbolic carriers, can be represented in a symbolic masculine way by the poetic language revolution. The present study addresses for the first time, Iranian children's and adolescent literature on Kristeva thought, as well as feminist reading. Not paying attention to the affinities of child and feminist literature as bilinguals of minority literature justifies the necessity of research.
Keywords: poetic language revolution, subjectivity, child's story, Kristeva, chora, semiotics, feminist criticism.
|
)