Feminist semanalysis of Children's Story of the 'Alone Black Line' From the perspective of the discourse of poetic language revolution

Document Type : -

Authors

1 Computational linguistics- Faculty of New Sciences and Technologies- Tehran University- Tehran-Iran Masters student

2 .

Abstract

In contrast to Lacan, who merely used language in subjectivity through "Father's Name", Kristeva introduced language, from the "Semiotic chora" motherhood dimension. Kristeva knows that power and language are intertwined, she sees language as a repressive factor. Thus, by emphasizing the semiotic side, she knows the path to suppression, to pay attention to the "poets' discourse of language". While the goal of post-structuralism is to alter the text, it is the goal of the research ahead, the alteration of the signs of subjectivity, based on Kristeva's views. In this regard, the present study using a descriptive-analytic method, seeks to answer two questions: In the text, what are the symptoms corresponding to the paradigms of poetic language revolution? According to what signs, the way of oppression, is the interaction of the semiotic of the feminine, and the symbolic of the masculine? The result of the research is a rejection of the separatist theory of radical feminism, and a confirmation of Kristeva's belief that women, as the most semiotic carriers, can be represented in a symbolic masculine way by the poetic language revolution. The present study addresses for the first time, Iranian children's literature on Kristeva thought, as well as feminist reading.

Keywords


پاینده، حسین (1397). نظریه و نقد ادبی. ج2. تهران: سمت.
پورعلی، حجت­الله؛ رویین­تن، فرهمند؛ و باقری، نرگس (1392). «خوانش رمان قاعدۀ بازی فیروز زنوزی جلالی بر پایۀ نظریۀ آلوده­انگاری کریستوا». مطالعات داستانی، 2 (2)، 26- 39.
توانا، محمدعلی؛ آذرکمند، فرزاد (1393). «سوبژکتیویته زن و رهایی در اندیشه ژولیا کریستوا: ایده­ای برای مشارکت امر نشانه­ای خلاق در عرصۀ عمومی نمادین». زن در توسعه و سیاست. 12 (2)، 206- 187.
زنجانبر، امیرحسین؛ بستانی، فاطمه؛ و کریمی­دوستان، غلامحسین (1399). «تحلیل استعاره­روانکاوی داستان کودکانة ’یک داستان محشر‘ بر پایة نظریة ناخودآگاه زبانی». پژوهشنامة نقد ادبی و بلاغت، 9 (1)، 43- 66.
سلدون، رامان؛ و ویدسون، پیتر (1387). راهنمای نظریۀ ادبی معاصر. ترجمۀ عباس مخبر. تهران: طرح نو.
سلیمی­کوچی، ابراهیم؛ سکوت­جهرمی، فاطمه (1394). «بررسی شخصیتهای داستان انار بانو و پسرهایش: ازمنظر تن بیگانۀ کریستوا». ادب­پژوهی، 9 (31)، 117- 135.
علامی، ذوالفقار؛ باباشاهی، فاطمه (1396). «بررسی داستان سیاوش براساس نظریه آلودگی ژولیا کریستوا». پژوهش زبان و ادبیات فارسی، 15 (46)، 1-26.
فتح­زاده، حسن؛ دارابی، مرضیه؛ مصطفوی، شمس­الملوک (1397). «انقلاب در زبان: مبانی نظریۀ معنا نزد کریستوا». متافیزیک، 10 (26)، 17-32.
  فینک، بروس (1397). سوژۀ لکانی. ترجمۀ محمدعلی جعفری. تهران: ققنوس.
کریستوا، ژولیا (1389). فردیت اشتراکی. ترجمۀ مهرداد پارسا. تهران: روزبهان.
نجفی، امیر؛ لزگی، حبیب­الله؛ و یوسفیان، محمدجعفر (1395). «معنازایی در عدول از پیش متن: خوانش بینامتنی هابیل و قابیل و رمان­های هابیل سانچت و سمفونی مردگان». جستارهای ادبی، 49 (1)، 1- 20.
نجفی، زهره (1396). «تحلیل امر نشانه­ای و امر نمادین در قصۀ شهر سنگستان براساس نظریۀ کریستوا». پژوهش ادبیات معاصر جهان، 22 (2)، 615- 639.
هنرکار، لیلا (1394). خط سیاه تنها. تصویرگر: زهرا کیقبادی. تهران: علمی­وفرهنگی.
 

Alami, Z. & Babashahi, F. (2017). "Story of Siavash in Shahnameh Based on Julia Kristeva’s Theory of Abjection". Research in Persian Language and Literature. Autumn,15 (46), 1- 26. [in Persian].

Barrett, E. (2011). Kristeva Reframed: Interpreting Key Thinkers for the Arts. New York: I. B. Tauris.

Fathzade, H., Darabi, M. & Mostafavi, M. (2018). "Revolution in Language: Theory of Meaning Based on Kristeva s Attitude". Metaphysik, 10 (2), 17-32. [in Persian].
Fink, B. (2018). The Lacanian Subject. Mohammad ali Jafari (Trs.). Tehran: Ghoghnoos. [in Persian].
Friedman, L. (1999). The horizontal Society. New Haven. CT:Yale University Press.
Guberman, R.(1996). Julia Kristeva Interviews. New York: Columbia university Press.
Honarkar, L. (2015)." Black Line Only". Tehran: Scientific and Cultural Publishing Company. [in Persian].
Kristeva, J. (1982). Powers of Horror: An Essay on Abjection. Waller, M. (Trs.). New York: Columbia university Press.
Kristeva, J.  (1984). "Revolution in Poetic Language". Waller, M. (Trs.). New York: Columbia university Press.
Kristeva, J. (1986). "The System and Speaking Subject". in Moi, T. (ed.). The Kristeva Reader. Oxford: Basil Blackwell. 24- 33.
Kristeva, J. (1989). "Language the Unknown: An Initiation into Linguistics". Menke, A. (Trs.). New York: Columbia university Press.
Kristeva, J. (2000). "The Sense and Non-sense of Revolt: The Powers and Limits of Psychoanalysis". Herman, J. (Trs.). Vol (1). New York: Columbia university Press.

Kristeva, J. (2016). "Shared Individuality". M. Parsa (Trs.). Tehran: Roozbehan.[in Persian].

Lechte, J. & Margaroni, M. (2004). "Julia Kristeva: Live Theory".
 
New York: Continuum.
Mcafee, N. (2004). "Julia Kristeva: Critical Thinkers" London and New York and Canada:Routledge.

Najafi, A., Lezgee, H. & Yousefian, M. J. (2016). "Significance of Deviation from Hypotext: Intertextual Study of Abel Sanchez (Miguel de Unamuno) and Symphony of Death (Abbas Maroofi)". Literary Studies, 49 (1). 1- 20.


 

Najafi, Z. (2017). "Analysis of the Semiotic and the Symbolic in Ghesseye Shahre Sangestan Based on Kristeva's Theory". Research in Contemporary World Literature, 22 (2), 615- 639. [in Persian].

Oliver, K. (1993). Reading Kristeva: Unraveling the Double-blind. Blooington: Indiana University Press.
Payandeh, H. (2018). Literary Theory and Criticism. Vol (2). Tehran: SAMT. [in Persian].
Payne, M. (1993). Reading Theory: An Introduction to Lacan, Derrida, and Kristeva. Massachusetts: Black Well.

Pourali, H., Farhmand, R., & Bagheri, N. (2014). "A Critical Reading of "Ghaedeye Bazi", a Novel by Firouz Zenouzi Jalali, Based on Julia Christeva's Theory of Abjection".Myth and Story, 2 (2), 26-39. [in Persian].

Salami Koochi, E.  & Sokoot Jahromi, F. (2014). "The Characters of Nārbānu and Her Sons from the Perspective of Kristeva’s Abject Body". Adab Pazhuhi, 9 (31), 117- 135. [in Persian].

Selden, R. & Widdowson. P. (2008). A Reader's Guide to Contemporary Literary Theory. Mokhber. A.(Trs.). Tehran:Tarh-e now.

Showalter, E. (1978). A Literature of Their Own: British Women Novelists from Bronte to Lessing. London: Virago.

Tavana, M. & Azarkamand, F. (2015)." Subjectivity of Women and Release in Kristeva’s Thought: The Idea for Participation of Matter Semiotic of Genius in Public Sphere of Symbolic". Women in Development and Polietics, 12 (2), 187- 206. [in Persian].

Zanjanbar, A., Bostani, F., &Karimi Dostan, Gh.(2020).The Psychoanalytic Analysis of Metaphor of "Thing from Nothing" Childish Story, Based on Unconscious Language Theory.Journal of Literary Criticism and Rhetoric, 9 (1).[in Persian].
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Feminist semanalysis of Children's Story of the 'Alone Black Line' From the perspective of the discourse of poetic language revolution
 
Amir Hossein Zanjanbar[1]
 
Ayoob Moradi[2]
 
 
abstract
The post-structuralist approach of semanalysis is a combination of semiotics and psychoanalysis and is based on the spaking subject, on two-dimensional heterogeneity of language 'sign' and 'symbolic'. In contrast to Lacan, who merely used language in subjectivity through "Father's Name", Kristeva also introduced language, from the "Signal blindness " motherhood dimension. Kristeva knows that power and language are intertwined, and she sees language as a repressive factor. Thus, by emphasizing the sign side, she knows the path to suppression, to pay attention to the "poets' discourse of language". While the goal of post-structuralism is to alter the text, it is the goal of the research ahead, the alteration of the signs of subjectivity, based on Kristeva 's views. In this regard, the present study using a descriptive-analytic method, seeks to answer two questions: In the text, what are the symptoms corresponding to the paradigms of poetic language revolution? According to what signs, the way of oppression in modern society, is the interaction of the feminine sign, and the symbolic of the masculine? The result of the research is a rejection of the separatist theory of radical feminism, and a confirmation of Kristeva 's belief that women, as the most symbolic carriers, can be represented in a symbolic masculine way by the poetic language revolution. The present study addresses for the first time, Iranian children's and adolescent literature on Kristeva thought, as well as feminist reading. Not paying attention to the affinities of child and feminist literature as bilinguals of minority literature justifies the necessity of research.
Keywords: poetic language revolution, subjectivity, child's story, Kristeva, chora, semiotics, feminist criticism.
 
[1] Children ̓s and Young Adults ̓ Literature, Payame Noor University, Tehran,  Iran. (Corresponding Author).
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3517-9798
rahimi.zanjanbar@ut.ac.ir
 
[2] Associate Professor of Persian Literature Department , Payame Noor University, Tehran, Iran.
 
Received: 02-10-2020                        Accepted: 28-01-2021