نوع مقاله : علمی-پژوهشی
نویسندگان
1 دانشگاه اصفهان
2 دانشگاه شهید بهشتی ره
چکیده
کلیدواژهها
عنوان مقاله [English]
نویسندگان [English]
One of the issues in Imami jurisprudence and Iranian law that has provided a place for debate and division of judges’ opinions is the issue of returning in divorce, which is considered as a right for men in revocable divorces. In this regard, if the wife stipulates to the man during the necessary marriage that the man has no right to return after the revocable divorce and cannot exercise his right, the question is, what is the status of this condition in terms of validity? The authors in the present article, adopting an analytical-descriptive method, and studying the principles and evidences, believe that: although some consider referral to be a man’s right and therefore, due to the nature of the right, it can be revoked, the legal and jurisprudential nature of referral is one of the rules of the matter, so the condition to the contrary seems invalid. Examination of the evidence also reflects the ruling on returning in divorce, which is on the basis of Islamic narrations. On the other hand, the possibility of revoking the referral, contrary to the need to take care of the interests of the family, is also based on evidence.
کلیدواژهها [English]